![sonar move multidock to bottom of page sonar move multidock to bottom of page](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Td40u6SYePM/U4HgXhztBhI/AAAAAAAAKtg/lehEwrJ768I/s1600/shot+008.png)
The interface has been radically overhauled, largely doing away with multiple floating windows in favour of a docked-panel approach. In this latest update, the emphasis is on workflow. It was among the first music packages to combine traditional recording techniques with dance-oriented loop manipulation, and powerful features such as its V-Vocal pitch manipulation and AudioSnap audio quantise predate similar features in its main rival, Steinberg Cubase. So, at least it should have identical window-arranging experience to the CUBASE for OSX.Cakewalk Sonar has an impressive history of innovation. I hope they come up with something entirely of their own.! Or at least something that keeps Cubase as Cubase - not turn it into some other ‘clone’ software. Whatever they do, I want Cubase to be Cubase.
![sonar move multidock to bottom of page sonar move multidock to bottom of page](http://static.cakewalk.com/documentation/SONAR/EN/images/NewFeatures.008.1.png)
So maybe it could be an optional thing maybe, I don’t have to upgrade…! Its the way the industry survives.īut, speaking to the OP now, I don’t want Sonar X1 or PhotoShop or Studio One interface for Cubase thank you. P.S.: SONAR X1’s available screen area could be extremely expanded when you press “C” “I” “B” “D”, then the Transport Box / Multidock / Inspector / Media Browser are totally hidden, then you can get the maximum screen area for work. The Transport Block could be designed so that it could spontaneously moved under the cursor when some hotkey pressed, or docked like SONAR X1. Why not Cubase on Windows use SDI Form Structure and Taskbar for Docking? (Let us forget about Vista and WinXP)
SONAR MOVE MULTIDOCK TO BOTTOM OF PAGE MAC
What I really disgusted is the disadvantage of MDI Form Structure.Ĭubase 6 on MAC using SDI Form Structure and OSX-Docking, it’s very comfortable. Yeah, well, it should be optional (as my true opinion). it does use docking, but i think they get away with it because the overall interface is so plain and boring anyway! one thing that would be good for me is to have a docked transport and info bar at the bottom, just like the old atari cubase. On the other hand, i also use sony vegas pro. don’t know why so many people seem to want docking… I’d hate to see cubase do this, unless the docking was optional. horrible interface for me! the windows all docked meant that the usable arrangement area for parts was about 2 inches high by 6 inches wide (on a 15.4 inch screen!). I’m looking forward to see the OFFICIAL traditional Chinese Language interface soon. The Chinese(Simplified) Language interface translation still needs improvement. (Windows Platform) Allow users to personalize the font of CUBASE. (Windows Platform) Make the font size a little more bigger and use FREETYPE font-rendering (looks like OSX’s font rendering style), or it may looks terrible when using Japanese and Chinese Language interface (and it’s bad for eyes). Maybe AT LEAST these child-windows could be docked on the Taskbar when using SDI Form Structure.Ĭubase on Windows should have same window-arranging experience like Cubase on Mac OSX. (It could be designed as an optional function, because some Cubase users hate such design.) Use dock-based window style (similar to Sonar X1 or Adobe Photoshop (upper than CS4)).Įspecially, SONAR X1 could easily use shortcut keys to open or hide docks. It’s terrible to arrange those child-windows manually.
![sonar move multidock to bottom of page sonar move multidock to bottom of page](https://static.garmincdn.com/en/products/010-01379-01/g/livevu-forward.png)
MDI Form Structure often made the GUI into a MESS when I press F3 (Mixer) or F11 (VST Rack Window). (Windows Platform) Use SDI Form Structure INSTEAD OF MDI Form Structure (just like Cubase 6.5 on OSX).
![sonar move multidock to bottom of page sonar move multidock to bottom of page](https://www.libble.eu/bestanden1/698629/bg11.png)
In my opinion it seems more efficient if it contains the following improvements in its next version: